Volume 4, Issue 2, June 2018, Page: 10-16
The Effect of Academic Information Systems and Library Information Systems upon Quality Information Systems and Student Trust as an Intervening Variable
Yuli Anwar, Department of Accounting, Economic College of Binaniaga, Bogor, Indonesia
Liana Rahardja, Department of Accounting, Jakarta International College, Jakarta, Indonesia
Received: Jun. 17, 2018;       Accepted: Jul. 23, 2018;       Published: Sep. 3, 2018
DOI: 10.11648/j.ijsmit.20180402.11      View  330      Downloads  24
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine and analyze empirically the influence of Academic information system, Library information system, and student trust, upon the quality of information system. Respondents in this study were students at private university in Bogor, Indonesia. The analysis used in this study using path analysis model, which is a method that uses exogenous and endogenous variables. The finding of this study sub-structural one that there is a direct influence and positive significant between academic information system on students and library information system. Meanwhile, the sub-structural two found that there is direct influence and positive significant between academic information system on the quality of information system and library information system to the quality of information system, as well as the indirect effect positive academic information system by considering students trust to the quality of information system, and as well as the indirect effect positive library information system by considering the students trust to the quality of information system.
Keywords
Academic Information Systems (AIS), Library Information Systems (LIS), Student Trust (ST), Quality Information Systems (QIS)
To cite this article
Yuli Anwar, Liana Rahardja, The Effect of Academic Information Systems and Library Information Systems upon Quality Information Systems and Student Trust as an Intervening Variable, International Journal of Sustainability Management and Information Technologies. Vol. 4, No. 2, 2018, pp. 10-16. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsmit.20180402.11
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Asif, M. and Krogstie, J. (2011). Mobile student information system, Campus-Wide Information Systems, Vol. 28 Issue: 1, pp. 5-15.
[2]
Etin, I. (2011). Management of academic information system of universities based on Information and Communication Technology, Educational Research Journal, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 51-67.
[3]
Gardiner, D.; McMenemy, D.; and Chowdhury, G. (2006). A snapshot of information use patterns of academics in British universities, Online Information Review, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 341-359.
[4]
Garoufallou, E.; Zafeiriou, G.; Siatri, R., and Balapanidou, E. (2013). Marketing applications in Greek academic library services, Library Management, Vol. 34 No. 8/9, pp. 632-649.
[5]
Harris, S. (2017). Top trends and issues in Jamaican academic libraries Information, Informationand Learning Science, Vol. 11 8 No. 1/2, pp. 17-47.
[6]
Hemp, P. (2009), Death by information overload, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 87 No. 9, pp. 83-89.
[7]
Irwansyah, 2003, User Evaluation of Technology Task Matches Affecting Individual Performance, Thesis, Gadjah Mada University.
[8]
Kaur, B. and Verma, R. (2009). Use and impact of electronic journals in the Indian institute of technology, The Electronic Library, Vol. 27 No. 4, pp. 611-622.
[9]
Kwanya, T.; Stilwell, C.; and Underwood, P. G. (2011), Library 2.0 versus other library service models: a critical analysis, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, Vol. 44 No. 3, pp. 145-162.
[10]
Lau, E. A, (2003). The influence of user participation upon user satisfaction in development of information systems with five moderating variable, National Accounting Seminar VI, October.
[11]
Sugiyono. (2017). Qualitative Research Method (For research: exploratif, enterpretif, interactive, and konstructive), Publisher CV. Alfabeta: Bandung.
[12]
Sultono; Seminar, K. B.; and Erizal. (2015). Analysis on Academic Information System Quality Toward User Satisfaction, International Journal of Administrative Science & Organization, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 122-129.
[13]
Suryaningrum, D. H. (2003). The relationship between user Participation and system success: study of three contingeny Factors on BUMN in Indonesia, National Accounting Seminar VI, October.
[14]
Wilson, T. D. (2000), Human information behavior, Informing Science, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 49-55.
Browse journals by subject